| > |
Qualitative Software
Choice and Comparison Sessions |
| |
|
| > |
Integrating Software
Use to Your Qualitative Project |
| |
|
| > |
Work Sessions for
Specific QDA Packages |
| |
|
| > |
Methodological Implications
of Software Use |
Company president, Ray Maietta, has co-authored
an article with John Creswell that appears in the current edition
of the "Handbook of Research Design and Social Measurement."
This article, "Systematic Procedures of Inquiry and Computer
Data Analysis Software for Qualitative Research," informs
much of our work with clients.
We think it is critical for qualitative scholars
to carefully consider which qualitative package best suits their
needs. Current marketing materials and feedback from users prove
uneven and inconsistent with the balance of features and functionality
of major packages. After attending one of our comparison sessions,
which are informed by material from the "Handbook of Research
Design and Social Measurement" article, we find that a good
number of scholars adopt a package that is not the one that they
originally intended to use and others switch from packages they
have used in the past.
Currently our services focus on several major QDA
software packages:
| |
· |
ATLAS.ti |
| |
|
|
| |
· |
ETHNOGRAPH 5.0 |
| |
|
|
| |
· |
HyperResearch 2.5 |
| |
|
|
| |
· |
MaxQDA
and WinMAX |
| |
|
|
| |
· |
QSR Products: Classic
N4, N6, NVIVO, Merge for NVIVO |
We ground our QDA software skills integration sessions
in discussions of qualitative process. Work sessions are organized
around tasks critical to QDA rather than around features of the
software (ex. we discuss strategies for data organization rather
than simply describing HyperResearch 2.5 case cards).
Our skills integration and consulting services can
focus at introductory, intermediate, advanced, and overview levels
for each package. In addition, we offer comparison seminars and
work sessions. Comparison seminars can focus on all packages we
offer. Comparison work sessions can focus on three packages; however,
two are ideal.
^back to top
|